Respect for children and trust in their inherent enthusiasm for learning are the values that shape our educational processes and objectives. Our purpose is to cultivate independent thinking, protect children's natural joy and ease in learning, and to preserve their sense of creativity, curiosity, and self-esteem. Children flourish in Sparhawk's resource-rich and emotionally supportive environment.

    Sparhawk Elementary School offers a progressive approach to education. Collaboration and teamwork, creativity and imagination, critical thinking and problem-solving, are the core tenants of the Sparhawk approach. Your child will learn in a hands & minds-on environment through authentic real-life experiences. We are dedicated to maintaining the small class sizes that ensure the continued quality of curriculum that each student receives. With an average 9:1 student to teacher ratio, each child benefits greatly from the individualized attention from their teachers.

    Thematic Approach

    Sparhawk School uses a thematic approach to curriculum design. Themes are frameworks that allow expansion and integration of big ideas over time because even very young children live in a world of big ideas. Schools should help delve deeply and meaningfully into this world.

    Themes, such as "Migration" or "Islands" or abstractions like "Balance," encourage discovery rather than simply rote memorization and give context and purpose to the practice of basic skills. In other words, they integrate and give meaning to what children and teachers do every day.

    Without an overarching plan, curriculum is just busywork. Imagine, instead, a beautifully, intricate tapestry. Its well-thought-out design is the theme, and the curriculum is the collection of gloriously multicolored threads with which to embellish the work at hand.

    Our little ones think big ideas, but need tangible experiences to process them- they think with their hands and their brains. They must touch, assemble, reassemble, and examine things as well as ideas. They need chatter and reflect out loud and, at times, need quiet. Opportunities to work independently and in teams are important, and students receive support in balancing the natural egocentricity of this age with participation in the social world of school. The art of teaching them is in satisfying individual and group needs and providing kind attention to everyone.

    As we learn together day-by-day, in our cozy classrooms resplendent with resources, sunshine, and goodwill, we are endlessly fascinated. Our youngest students are precious bundles of potential, all blossoming according to their own developmental timetable. To nurture successfully and educate them at this tender age requires the small group sizes and culture of kindness we enjoy at Sparhawk.

    The Sparhawk Formula

    The Sparhawk Formula, A Mosaic of Teaching and Learning Styles

    by Louise Stilphen, Headmaster & Founder

    David Hawkins, Professor Emeritus from the University of Colorado, developed a model using symbols to represent three levels of teacher interaction with students. His basic model is valuable in describing the cognitive component of a typical day at Sparhawk’s Lower School, so it is used and, with his permission, expanded on in this article.

    Represents those activities that children undertake spontaneously in either a prepared environment or a natural one. The teacher’s role is to observe and reflect.

    Represents a choice by the teacher to intervene and focus children’s spontaneous activity or to provide “scaffolding” that fosters discovery. For example:

    • by adding materials
    • by asking questions designed to inspire further investigation • with a demonstration or suggestion
    • by modeling
    • by suggesting that the child initiate documentation
    • by asking the child to become the expert and find out more • by encouraging the application of core skills to find an answer

    Represents reliance on authoritative sources. Teachers plan curriculum that supports the acquisition and refinement of academic skills and an evolving knowledge-base.

    • information given; questions answered • practicing and internalizing basic skills • books, films, artifacts, etc. • strategies for problem-solving
    • lectures, dialogue

    The Sparhawk Formula describes a mosaic of teaching and learning styles. The component parts of the Sparhawk model, the circle, triangle, and square are, in real life, fluid and interactive -an integrated whole in practice. They also evolve with each developmental stage. Where elementary school is a balance of all three, middle and high school curriculum design mostly involves square and triangle levels.

    As students learn the mechanics of reading, writing, and mathematics, they are acquiring what are called academic skills, and when they are taught new information in a specific subject area and memorize facts, they are increasing their academic knowledge base. This ”square”, or convergent style of instruction is the one traditionally associated with schooling. As important as this type of teaching and learning is, it is insufficient because it does not, by itself, foster students’ evolving ability to ponder, formulate questions, hypothesize, solve problems or to think conceptually.

    “To instruct not a matter of getting him to commit results to mind. Rather, it is to teach him to participate in the process that makes possible the establishment of knowledge. We teach a subject not to produce little living libraries on that subject, but rather to get a take part in the process of knowledge-getting. Knowing is a process not a product.”
    - Jerome Bruner

    “Circle” and “triangle” experiences, engage children in a process of inquiry. They provide opportunity to fashion information meaningfully, rather than just memorize it, and they naturally require the application of emerging skills, including those from the square level, in the context of important rather than solely rote work. Circle and triangle stages encourage divergent thinking. They activate children’s natural curiosity and enable them to develop questions, seek their own answers, and they tend to result in the most sustained interest and satisfaction. Here is where children gain confidence in their ability to generate knowledge. As clay is not a sculpture until the artist acts upon it, humans must construct meaning from what they learn in order to contour their understanding. The triangle and circle levels foster this experience.

    “When a room is dominated by predigested materials, the message
    is implicit: others have done the thinking, you memorize.”
    –Francis Hawkins

    The function of the “square” level is to formalize a lesson, give facts, or confirm hunches. Here, teachers direct the study process with curricular goals in mind. Activities are convergent and their design is intentional. Their purpose is to advance students’ learning along established scope and sequences and to stockpile information from authoritative sources. It is an effiicient way to deliver large amounts of information and to integrate experience through the lens of facts and theories, in other words, to sum-up findings from the triangle and circle levels. For students in the early grades, the square level has greatest value if it is a posteriori, that is, combined with, or deriving from, observations or experiences at the circle and triangle levels. Unless learning is meaningful to young children, unless it is proceeds from what they already understand about the world and what interests them, and unless it is useful, it will not be retained in any significant way.

    Circle, square, and triangle levels may occur in any sequence or operate separately and they may represent either planned or spontaneous interactions. They also apply to all curriculum content areas for each has discovery and mastery aspects. Everything, from art to science and music to math, even recess experiences, has all three levels, as we will demonstrate.

    At Sparhawk’s Lower and Middle Schools, the teacher’s job is to prepare and maintain a rich learning environment and to observe at each level and then decide on interactions that optimize individual learning at all levels.